Is Dave legit?
The operator and product terms are documented on this page. That does not establish that an advance is suitable for you or resolve allegations in a lawsuit. The legal record below was checked Sep 29, 2026.
A complaint records allegations, not a finding of liability. Settlements, entered orders, pending cases and supervisory agreements are labelled separately. Research coverage may be incomplete; dates and outcomes are limited to the cited records.
Class action, Los Angeles Superior Court (Stoffers v. Dave Inc., 20STCV35381)
2020-09-16 (settlement final approval 2023-12-12)
Settlement approved
The court approved a $3.2 million settlement over the 2020 data breach, with additional data-security commitments.
Court judgment hosted by settlement administrator ↗
Source detail and procedural history
Data breach of June 23 to July 1, 2020. Settled: $3.2 million gross settlement fund for about 243,000 class members, plus a commitment to added data-security measures for 5 years. Final approval granted 2023-12-12.
FTC (C.D. Cal. 2:24-cv-09566)
2024-11-05
Complaint, allegations
The FTC alleged misleading advance amounts, undisclosed fees, tipping practices and barriers to cancelling membership.
Official source: ftc.gov ↗
Source detail and procedural history
FTC complaint (FTC Act Section 5 and ROSCA) alleging Dave advertised 'up to $500' but offered $500 'only a tiny percentage of the time', hid a $3 to $25 express fee until after sign-up, pushed a default 15% 'tip' that many did not know they could refuse, claimed tips funded children's meals while donating only 10 cents per percentage point, and made the $1 monthly membership hard to cancel. Dave reported $149M+ in tip revenue from 2022 to mid-2024. Followed a January 2023 Civil Investigative Demand.
DOJ on behalf of FTC (United States v. Dave, Inc. and Jason Wilk)
2024-12-30
Amended complaint, pending
The DOJ amended the FTC case to add the CEO and seek penalties and refunds; the case remained pending in the reviewed record.
Official source: ftc.gov ↗
Source detail and procedural history
Amended complaint adds CEO Jason Wilk as defendant and seeks civil penalties, refunds and an injunction; alleges 'hundreds of millions of dollars in surprise fees' collected as tips. Court denied Dave's motion to dismiss on 2025-09-12; Dave answered 2025-10-10. Pending (FTC case status: pending; Dave accrued $9.7M for legal contingencies across matters as of 2026-06-30).
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (Circuit Court for Baltimore City; removed to D. Md. 1:26-cv-00369 on 2026-01-29)
2025-12-30
Lawsuit, pending
Baltimore alleged unfair and deceptive ExtraCash practices and sought an injunction, penalties and restitution.
Company SEC filing ↗
Source detail and procedural history
City alleges ExtraCash violates the Baltimore City Consumer Protection Ordinance through unfair and deceptive practices; seeks injunction, civil penalties and restitution. Remand motion briefed as of 2026-04-22. Pending.
Montgomery County (Pennsylvania) District Attorney
2026-09-28
Lawsuit, pending
The district attorney alleged Dave advance charges functioned as interest above Pennsylvania lending limits.
Official source: montgomerycountypa.gov ↗
Source detail and procedural history
Civil lawsuit alleging Dave's fees, tips and other charges on short-term cash advances function as interest far above Pennsylvania's lending limits. Filed together with a suit against MoneyLion; described as the first public consumer protection actions against digital payday lenders in Pennsylvania. Pending.
Connecticut Department of Banking, Maryland banking regulator, Maryland Attorney General (subpoena), New York DFS (subpoena), California DFPI
disclosed 2026 (10-Q for Q2 2026)
Inquiries, no filed action reported
Dave disclosed state regulatory inquiries and subpoenas; the source reports no filed action for these inquiries.
Company SEC filing ↗
Source detail and procedural history
Ongoing inquiries and investigations disclosed by Dave: CT and MD regulators on licensing and EWA rules and the bank partnership; MD AG subpoena on EWA marketing, fees and bank partnership; NY DFS subpoena on products offered in NY since 2021; DFPI says Dave is a 'covered person' under the CCFPL and intends to supervise it. No action filed.